Skip main content and go to side content

Where am I?

Retaining Teacher Talent

Report 3. Convergence and Contradictions in Teachers’ Perceptions of Policy Reform Ideas


Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., et al. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report No. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.

Baratz-Snowden, J. (2009). Fixing tenure: A proposal for assuring teacher effectiveness and due process. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

Boe, E. E., Cook, L. H., & Sunderland, R. J. (2006). Attrition of beginning teachers: Does teacher preparation matter? (Research Rep. 2006-TSDQ2). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, Center for Research and Evaluation in Social Policy. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Borman, G., & Dowling, M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409.

Coggshall, J. G., Ott, A., Behrstock, E., & Lasagna, M. (2010). Retaining teacher talent: The view from Generation Y. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates and New York: Public Agenda. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from Y report.pdf

Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects (working paper 11). Washington, DC: Calder Center. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2002). Resources, instruction, and research. In R. Boruch & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 8–119). Washington, DC: Brookings.

Daley, D. M. (2008). The burden of dealing with poor performers: Wear and tear on supervisory organizational engagement. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(1), 44–59.

Dolton, P. J. (2006). Teacher supply. In E. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education—Volume 2 (pp. 1079–1161). London: Elsevier.

Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103–112.

Farkas, S., Johnson, J., & Foleno, T. (with Duffet, A., & Foley, P.). (2000). A sense of calling: Who teaches and why. New York: Public Agenda. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from

Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 557–577.

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

Glazerman, S., McKie, A., & Carey, N. (2009). An evaluation of the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) in Chicago: Year one impact report. Chicago, IL: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. & The Joyce Foundation. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.

Gold, B. (2002). Social construction of urban education: New Jersey whole school reform and teachers’ understanding of social class and race. New York: Pace University.

Guarino, C., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.

Hanushek, E. (2008). Teacher deselection. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from Teacher_Deselection-Hanushek.pdf

Hassel, E. A., & Hassel, B. (2009). 3X for all: Extending the reach of America’s best. Chapel Hill, NC: Public Impact. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Hirsch, E. (with Church, K.). (2009). North Carolina teacher working conditions survey brief: Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Holdheide, L. R., & Reschly, D. J. (2008). Teacher preparation to deliver inclusive services to students with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Hoxby, C. M., & Leigh, A. (2004). Pulled away or pushed out? Explaining the decline of teacher aptitude in the United States. American Economic Review, 93, 236–240.

Imazeki, J., & Goe, L. (2009). The distribution of highly qualified, experienced teachers: Challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Ingersoll, R., & Kralik, J. (2004). Who stays in teaching and why: A review of the literature on teacher retention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Isenberg, E., Glazerman, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Lugo-Gil, J., Grider, M., et al. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the second year of a randomized controlled study. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers (NBER Working Paper No. 15202). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Jepsen, C., & Rivkin, S. G. (2002). Class size reduction, teacher quality, and academic achievement in California public elementary schools. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.

Koppich, J. E. (2009). Minneapolis: A different take on tenure. Madison, WI: Strategic Management of Human Capital.

Krueger, A. B., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college test-taking and middle school results: Evidence from Project STAR. Economic Journal, 111, 1–28.

Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers’ interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 177–204.

National Council on Teacher Quality. (2009). Human capital in Seattle Public Schools. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

New Teacher Center. (2009). NTC statement on Mathematica study. Santa Cruz, CA: Author. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2002). Do low-achieving students benefit more from small class sizes? Evidence from the Tennessee Class Size Experiment. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 24(3), 201–217.

Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective classroom management: Teacher preparation and professional development. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

O’Reilly, C. A., & Weitz, B. A. (1980). Managing marginal employees: The use of warnings and dismissals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(3), 467–484.

Podgursky, M. J., & Springer, M. G. (2007). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909–949.

Rennie Center for Education Research & Policy, & Teach Plus. (2009). Ready for the next challenge: Improving the retention and distribution of excellent teachers in urban schools. Cambridge, MA, and Boston: Authors. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Ryan, J. B., Sanders, S., Katsiyannis, A., & Yell, M. L. (2007). Using time-out effectively in the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(4), 60–67.

Springer, M. G., Lewis, J. L., Podgursky, M. J., Ehlert, M. W., Taylor, L. L., Lopez, O. S., et al. (2009). Governor’s Educator Excellence Grant program: Year three evaluation. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Vegas, K. C., Jenson, W. R., & Kircher, J. C. (2007). A single-subject meta-analysis of the effectiveness of time-out in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 32(2), 109–121.

Westat. (2000). A high quality teacher for every classroom: Study of personnel needs in special education (SPeNSE summary sheet). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from

Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved January 15, 2010, from


<< Previous | Next >>

Go back to main content | Go back to main navigation

Go back to main content | Go back to main navigation

Go back to main content | Go back to main navigation